Buffalo Ledger

Senator Patrick M. Gallivan, a Republican from Elma, alongside Senate Minority Conference members, business groups, and various stakeholders, is urging the exclusion of the HEAT Act from ongoing budget discussions. The proposed legislation, if passed, would prohibit using natural gas in residential and commercial settings, which has raised concerns about increased utility expenses and reduced consumer choices.

"The HEAT Act is another example of an unrealistic energy policy that New York residents and businesses cannot afford," stated Senator Gallivan. He added that this Act, combined with the Climate Leadership Community Protection Act (CLCPA), would lead to higher costs and limited options for residents, describing the approach as "unachievable, cost-prohibitive, and unsustainable."

Daniel Ortega, Executive Director of New Yorkers for Affordable Energy, highlighted the potential financial impact of the Act. "We estimate that if the bill were enacted, most consumers would see an $800 yearly increase in energy costs," Ortega noted. He expressed gratitude toward Leader Ortt and Senate Republicans for their support in opposing the Act, despite the possible increase in energy bills for 75 percent of New Yorkers and job losses in the union sector.

Francis Palasieski, representing the Northeastern Retail Lumber Association, emphasized the negative implications for small businesses. "This bill will only drive prices higher, making it even harder for everyday New Yorkers to afford basic home repairs," he stated.

Additionally, Thomas J. Murphy, Vice President of Power and Construction Group, voiced concerns about job implications. "This bill is expensive, and it will reduce jobs as well as consumer choice," Murphy asserted, urging the Assembly and the Governor to dismiss the HEAT Act from the budget plans.

The deadline for adopting a new state budget is April 1, as discussions continue among the governor's office and legislative leaders.