Senator Patrick Gallivan of New York State endorsed several legislative proposals during the week of April 7, 2025. These proposals span diverse topics, from criminal justice to environmental issues. Gallivan demonstrated his support for a significant number of the measures brought before the NYS Senate, expressing agreement with various legislative changes.
Among the supported initiatives was Bill S7239, which relates to government appropriations. Another measure, S1285A, focuses on amendments to criminal procedure law concerning jury deliberations. In both cases, Senator Gallivan cast an “AYE” vote.
On public safety, Bill S1652 allows orders of protection to be included in a computerized registry. Gallivan voted “AYE” on this measure, aligning with his support for improved tracking of protection orders.
Gallivan also approved Bill S364, which prevents insurance policy restrictions based on dog breeds, and S2481, mandating a study on hydrogen energy feasibility. In educational matters, he supported Bill S3735, permitting additional voting days in the event of disasters.
Other approved bills include S630, requiring district attorneys to notify victims post-case disposition, and S197, enhancing sentences for aggravated animal cruelty, dubbed “Tucker’s law.” Gallivan backed S703, reducing the injury severity needed to charge felony animal cruelty, and S4816, including Lyme disease under workers’ compensation.
However, Senator Gallivan opposed several measures. He voted “NAY” on S115A, aimed at increasing resources for culturally diverse arts organizations, considering it unnecessary. Similarly, he rejected S4153, prohibiting establishments from denying cash payments, as anti-business. Gallivan also opposed changes in S3807, which alters proof requirements in negligence cases involving sexual offenses, viewing them as unfair.
Senator Gallivan supported several environmental proposals too. S4466 ensures the right to display religious items on property entryways, provided certain conditions are met, and S3629A, which restricts animal participation in traveling acts, although Gallivan dissented on the latter, citing educational concerns.
In summary, Senator Gallivan’s votes reflect a mixture of support for governmental, educational, and environmental measures, alongside a critical stance on legislative changes he perceives as unnecessary or inequitable.
